And GAZA the total deriliction of human-kind because The Fact there's people BELIEVE Western-LIBtaRDS actually still think THEIR SOCIETIES actuallyCARE about them and that they need*to SAVE THE WORLD?Testimony on the CRIME OF THE HISTORICAL RECORD!xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Get yer news paper, here! Get yer newspaper here! Anyone thinks the NEW YORK times needs to be covering the entire surface of the planet? That is NOT GOING TO EVER BE NEWS*for anybody.
And, so, while That's a nice beginning and the truth of what's necessary for a COMPLETE REFACTOR of the media-'space'(let's call it a "space"for the layman because, really*, its really a type lidding-mechanism that transmutates ideation from a single individual into the most far-reaching interpretive-frameworking of THAT SINGLE IDEA as it is receptible across all of society, which makes it a kind of 'lowest-common-denominator producer) it is also the case that the topical nature of GAZA,pertains on something so inheringly CRIMINAL, it's not possible for most any brain to conceive of it:and that, that is that the present predicament for LIBERAL-ism,manufactures its own sense of GOODNESS and anything that does this is itself pathologically criminal and it has always been that that isthe definitionof exoneration from criminality, actually, but it SHOULD ALWAYS HAVE BEEN indicative of the presence of a person that cannot be habilitated into society in any way shape or form rather than becoming productive of the same crime, which is: thinking you and your cohort are BETTER THAN THEY ARE ACTUALLY inherently(and the 'gift' of your generosity of spirit on another's crime the expression of liberalism as toleration of criminality for the benefit of toleration itself which is itself a core tenet of theMultiFacet of natures of improveabilities that 'liberalism' pretends to care about. But the whole truth? No:it's actually the falsity of the entire endeavour that expresses itself in this multi-faceted way****(and it IS IMPORTANT HERE TO recognize it is a 'way'rather than a 'means' and when a way becomes a means it means that there is no understanding about what the means is which leaves the way as a placeholder on a concept that evacuates something underneath that concept that anyone will know it PRACTICALLY pertains on as a POLITICAL FAVOR!!!)--the 'whole truth' is that there is no longer a way to indoctrinate people into what it is that liberalism actually espouses any longer but Pretend to Be Better Than Your Neighbor type bullshit.
And where that becomes the Crime of the Historical Record is that it no longer makes any sense how much of actuality falls into the domain of the political favor mentioned above, because it is fucking all of it and no single person in the government any longer does ANYTHING OTHER THAN TRADE economic FAVORS for political benefits under the aegis of faking the moves until it lands a probability across a region of actually existing earth that contains within it some expression of the dreamed-of benefit pertaining to the exclusion zone of the favor and the ask of the requester to whom the favor goes as a political handout which, while tortured, is a way of describing how this stuff CATALYZES ABSOLUTE unpredictabilities. And while the science of this economic-model yet-to-come is not the aegis of this essay; it is also the case that the crime of it, which actually is quite understandable now, pertains on the fact that the lack of ANY ACTUALITY in these do-gooders decision-pertaining makes their do-gooding itself a criminal endeavor across any and everybody because their only point is to be better and being better simply means WINNING THE ARGUMENT, actually, because nobody has a real sense of what it is they are trying to do, actually, they just need to manifest a pathetic display of one form or another that gets the job done as a pretense that cannot be overcome(and, luckily for liberals, their liberalism is itself a exfoliateable flower of bullshit reasons to be better than everybody)...
So, when it comes to lasting enduring planning?There is NONE OF THAT in the CONCEPTION OF economic might that defines what most everyone on this miserable planet seems to think in 2025:IT'S ALL FIGURED owht(would say Lindsay Graham of all people the most wormy box of nothing-burger shit ever to have a endearing sense of pride in integrity itself that DOES MAKE HIM worth something as a UNITED STATES representative in Congressional leadership(because nobody in that body BELIEVES *at all* in INTEGRITY OF ANY kind shape of endearing quality)). Technology, copy-right's demolition totally...who the fuck knows actually what the itemized list might ever be by some academic egg-head, the truth is actually like a control-systems plot or an hysterisis curve on nadir-returning: there's just this flower at a certain level and a technologicalized-context in which that thing can blossom across the entire politicized moon-scape of this planet in these 'news'people's brains(which is what everyone needs to be actually in order to get the max-blossom out of their pathetic do-good performance across my or your life) which is also testament to the rarified nature of the ideological elaboration itself at present which is just fuckin' paper-mache now these morons could fuckin' a care less what 'get's it done'.
So, returning to GAZA? There ain't no 14,000 babies gonna die there in 24-hours and even if there were that many lost-cause video-gamer-bloggers going to be thrown away for a social-media stunt(which is* possible actually those people could also care less what it takes to make a point on their stupid land-grabREFUSAL to accept some other spot in the fuckin' tortured sun to live nobody has a RIGHT TO REMAIN ON THIS PLANET if some scum-sucker Jew wants them with all might of military force to move the fuck on from where they's at); and there isn't ever going to be in any single liberal brain the idea that a society of lib-tards can treat a social-malaiseSYMPtom that broadly and, importantly, that their silly 'society' of spectators could ever have enough POLICE to effectively make that treatment roll-outable in any time-frame at all(i.e.,the actual IDEA that's possible?3)---what there is, is that:! nobody gets to pretend they're better than their neighbor, it doesn't matter who the fuck you think you are, IT'S the end of that person's license to operate anything at all, particularly ANYTHING IN THE PUBLIC's INTEREST(which is why: trading favors is NOT politics actually and knowing the trades not LEADERSHIP of any kind that any one should care to indoctrinate the public on accepting). YOU are NOT BETTER than anyone else and to extent you think you are, it's time to sit-back and enter private society until such time there's ANYONE doesn't think that way, including yourself, because NOT THINKING that way means you can have a hope and PRAYER of ascertaining the actual contours of a decision of broader significance with regard to what is knowable at all within the framework of coming to know anything about what is knowable itself as communicable across a body-social4.
Footnotes
((((((In these footnotes " ' " should be translated as a " *". Thanks, the editing software here is garbage I so plan a total overhaul of this concept for a website that will be demonstrative of what "discovery" should mean more broadly in a properly sane web-based PROTOCOL.)))))); 1-> But the truth is more that with a BROKEN democratic system there is no WAY shape or MEANS of accessing this sphere--which is WHAT IT ACTUALLY IS
undefined--from the outside, and that is how the media as it is today known has decided its function is ACTUALLY to produce simultaneity across the understanding of all human-kind which was never what the news was ever
undefinedCONCEIVED to be. What it NEEDS TO BE is geospatially isolated by enforceable laws on coverage-areas and a new 'internet' made that recognizes these limitations100000% and never gives results outside of local discovery networking at a protocol level...and that: a topic for another essay? Not really. It is more a topical subject for other's to consider until such time there is SOMEBODY IN Authority'''' that can manufacture the entire globe PROPERLY(and 'THAT', thatis all that can be hoped for no piecemeal will ever succeed on this problem at this point digital people realize this fact and HAVE NO INTENTION OF GIVING this prison-house systal(what they call it) UP.). ↩
And while the total truth of this never-before-elaborated economic concept''''(and it is one to the extent you believe that later on with a mountain of data these people will be able to correlate compensations beyond the grasp of any player in the game and erect on top of a totally acceptable to the people in the world economy"quote, and, LIKE EBAY DOES TODAY, along with most other tech-aspirants of any credence: elaborate the ACTUAL economic model on top of that economy(which, in cursor-form here would amount to knowing how a potentialized scum-bag might make hay with his handout on one set of terms according to another, which is his libertyEXCEPTIONas a personal endowment of an endowment that only the endowed"quote person might''''BELIEVE they can sus-out their next moves in the game tableau they got handed as a factorator'''''')) is beyond the scope of this essay, the truth of it is that it can never be totally consummated itself, which is where its own form of deliberate criminal-ISM originates(because it is an insistence on favoritism across categories of unknowabilities that pertains on hoping these people can sus-out the terms of the game in the next phase of it when in the present it just looks like it MIGHT BE in that DIRECTION and REGION). And <---all that is a handout for the tech-losers, only two(really only Elon Musk OR Taylor Swift herSelfSameSelf) people whom could, really, have the abilities and sense to walk-back this bullshit game on GAME theory itself knowing what can ever be accomplished without a lot more technology development across types of sciences we haven't even scratched the surface of at this point in time. ↩
And, The Actual Problem? For Christ's-sake, do you people not realize nowhere is ever going to be that effectateble on concern-effectualizing? That's, OF COURSE--for anyone else--what these types of people don't even realize, hard as that may be for a cynic to believe, these types of people simply just latch so effin' hard on their bullshit concern they forget their's no truth to the underlying claim and no broader-truth to the a civilizational aspiration they're actually conceivably involved in the historical significance of helping make-happen ↩
Which pertains on unknowables 'out there' on the horizon that are REAL THINGS that, unfortunately, do require FAITH(as any private understanding of even the most insignificant kind does) and a working-understanding of the praxis with regard to faith-based change-making and the actual contours of TOLERATION in the context of the rights-respected world in which one's own endeavor is itself transmutable into something of historical standardizable standard(because what is 'destinal' or 'fated' is not arbitrary in fact it is KNOWLEDGE of those that SHOULD pre-select members for public service, which is precisely what no tech-loser wants to accept what with his box of battery jumble and standardized killing robot isn't his certification on thinking logically human-kind is the top-dog on fuckin' everything and these fuckin' dust-pushers, not even workin' now with rocks and the socially-acceptablized brain-power to make a fuckin' fire-circle even, themselves, here on PLANET PRIMITIVE AS IT GETS, the total encapsulation of Karl Marx's UBERMAN as the DO-NOTHING expression of CAPITAL EFFLUEY. ↩