The thing* that a women can do with her tits is sell*THEMfor dollaros(which is a digital COINAGE system these losers have built ON TOP OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE currency FREE-PASS Janet Yellen has given these ABSOLUTE FUCKIN' TRASH people to let their girl-friends SUCK THE NUT OF FORT FUCKIN' knox.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

There's no amount of money that purchases the girl(Page1on 'BREASTS lol fuckin' lo fuckin' LLLLL!!!!!!!, that bitch is so TOTAL fuckin' paid-for you couldn't move her from her tiny cubicle she lives in now ON CALL FOR SUCKIN' TITS ON THE WHORE that MARK LOVES BEST OF ALL TO see her with(get it through YOUR BRAIN, there's nothing to square with these tits in a present real-moment, she could ask your opinion and you could study them in this same way you view them on social; BUUUUUUT, you'd have to be condoning her WHORISM cause that's the only reason she'd show you her fuckin' naked nipples under a shirt IN THAT way*, in that NIGHTLY ADVENTURISM(that ONLY COUPLES CAN partake-of; unless YOU DREAM their'dream' and think it's all LIBERAL CLAPTRAP 'I wouldn't give a fuck I can't sate the whore so who cares, show it to me so I CAN ALSO APPRECIATE IT....')....so that's a lot of preface and IT COUNTS for ONE SINGLE:reason,-----I"quote KNOW, Mark Zukerb'e'rg is slaying a total piece-meal animal farm now to see what pieces of bitch he wants to GROW FROM DNA. AND DON'T for a secondthink most of the politco-class, loser as it gets not, but losering on the loseringEST people ever to hold authority,, wants these LOSERS to continue so they CunALL foment a PROOF they WERE NEVER fuckin' A-GRADE LOSER(that's the fact of these totaltrash people, get it through YOUR FUCKIN' SKULL any one readin:::::!these losers are so fuckin' lost-cause loser they will never do anything at all side-of-proofing their non-compliance with the COOL-norms of life. THAT ANYONE with a fuckin' brain-cell KNOWS is NOT fuckin' walzing around 5000(they say K, as in FIVE-K BITCHES hoo-aaah!)<<....So, the thing with Isabella Rosellini's tits and they ARE tits(even though they DONOFACTOR into such a thought, which is what makes them interesting actually; they DO**** 'resemble' BREAst-meat which is funny enough(for HER THOUGH::::it was always the CAZZO that made the day, which meant, to her, that a COCK could penetrate the thickness of the tit-inscribe which made her one of the more interesting WOMEN in cinema at that time because most men, whether they ADMIT IT OR NOT(in cinema, basically exceptionally) are LOOKING FOR A WOMAN THAT CAN TRANSCRIBE affect into MEANING. And now it's probably APPARENT********* what the angle is here on those breasts cause the funny of them is that they never intruded on most people until PHOTOGRAPHersz DECIDED(and they, being aimless wandering FOOLS like almost every single JOURnalISM major(like Glenn Greenwald and his funny-stuff friend Michael Tracial, maybe if he aimsz his cock better he'll get his jizz in his own eye-sockets next time bud)----until PHOTOg(s) decided to limitate the nature of the PUBLIC's involvement in her private life and by that means GO superstellaris on her visibility essentially which meant, at the time, the "public" got almost nothing about her so that the DIRECTOR could CAST her without consideration for HOW THE PUBLIC had changed and THAT means, for a tired-out person????? She could maintain ALLURE; rather than, by becomeing familiar in the way in which photographersz would portray her as meaningfully****(which is essentially meaning something a bunch of times over the course of some amount of time based on some 'objective' focus***** of the frame(of the shot(of the camera****************************************************************************************************((((((((((:<><><>>>>;;;;;;;;))))))))))(although a MORE superfluous but quicker-sensemaking version is that it is like an[objectiviable] intention that ANYBODY would presume BASED ON THE way"the image is taken/what is in it in what way in which SHE PRESENTS***** as a 'standardizable'(bitch), etcandwhatnot.....).

AND THAT IS A WRAP for today;halve a nice evening this is WAY TOO HIGH-GRADE philosophy for a free-for-all BLOG LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL;.

Related Readingsz:::

• Page1on Breasts, http://www.thetortoise.org/page1on-breasts/