the role of hot women in cinema is?

a BEnighted community if you want to imagine a C there of such epic DECLINE ON STANDARDS? NO: the opposite is what this disgusting country calling itself A(meriCum) is all about now. Period. Fact. Bye bye Taylor Swiftus dipshit trash.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

a BEnighted community if you want to imagine a C there of such epic DECLINE ON STANDARDS? NO: the opposite is what this disgusting country calling itself A(meriCum) is all about now. Period. Fact. Bye bye Taylor Swiftus dipshit trash.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

But it isn't actually 'hot' we need to be discussing; it is sensual Nature. And, yet: "I am supposed to think or believe this woman is an ideal for me?" Changes the nature of the topic. Because'who gets to decide that ANY WOMAN IS AN Ideal, actually, for anyone, measuring one single person?' And, yet, that is also a causality* of the sociological with respect to the projektion and distributiveaffectationality of CINEMA Itself same selfSELFyself(which is how cinema produces A Me). Which IS irritating, once you recognize it; although it may only apply to history, once I do come to the ability* to recognize it? Well, it's always evolving, everything, so: "NO". I take my wife to the 1800s ballroom, probably some schmuck thinks the same thoughts about his life. And, yet, still, these(wregard to the xinema's voizjon") are FUNCTIONAL CHOICES in cinematical-KNOWLEDGE-constructing OF(a fake life)(; to depict a dream sequence to people;[,] so I must NEEds like lookylooker likefurther, then(into the Trotal Ppicter) potray-ed on that canvas of moving life imagery.....!DESIRE!, THE unspoken total truth of everything. You got it, I GOT it, you want to DEPICT IT, i need to inscript/it\\, or, at least, SOME VERSION* of IT for myself(I mean, I can't just live devoid of PURPOSE, can I?/./ AND YET(again), my poipose'*' is reconstructing elements of your* film; well? You!(shit-ass 'maker'mint-presd cert an t, "today",/that's)--YOU *better have chosen the total correctly for me, otherwise, I'm getting MISDIRECTED (a$$hole!!!!!); OR: you best've plumbed the depths of the ABSOLUTE TRUTH of something; otherwise,/////I get WRONGLY "orchestralizated"(which is a funny way to say I still should in-PLY myOwn STANDARDIZATION of an orchestration-compulsion al isticality? yes ).

So! DONE FOR NOW! And, at least, without further inscribed research,LetUSsay::::: meansz,Re-SEARCH is not good enough for it at all, my AI-interleaver-douchesz, please, fix the teletype on phones before DARING--EVEN/\Daring////--to address the academicalizatedness of all of existence you stupid fuckin pieces of just destitute CLAMOUR(thatNobody butNOBODYON oithOITH"(Earth!)" "wouldEVERDREAM"'people'--and these are not that now--<\could, EVER!!!!!, ever, ever, EVER,EVER,Get*, so motherfuckin'--FUCKIN'//!//--hot and fuckin'! bother'\t\ with literally ANY. SINGLE". (fuckin') * *THaNG */.